Apcr rounds men of war 2 driver#

Background Video That Motivated This Postįigure 2 shows the Youtube video that got me thinking. We can thank the gaming community for bringing so many of these facts about WW2 weapons into light. In response to an excellent response from a reader of my blog, I will also look at how the armor was constructed and how a Sherman's armor had a much more difficult attack to resist than the Tiger I did. Since the Sherman is listed as having 2 inches of frontal armor, I thought it would be interesting to examine his statement more closely to understand the reasoning behind the 3.6 inch statement. Specifically, he states that the Sherman had an equivalent frontal armor thickness of 3.6 inches compared to that of a Tiger I's 4.4 inches (see the video below, about 34 minutes in). While he addressed each of the concerns that I listed above, in this post I will limit my focus to his statement that the sloped frontal armor on the M4 Sherman was actually comparable to the unsloped frontal armor of a Tiger I. This weekend, I saw a Youtube video by a gentleman, with the handle 'The Chieftain', who works for as a researcher and he had a completely different take on the M4 Sherman than I had heard before. the M4 should have been replaced earlier by the M26 Pershing.The comments I heard about the M4 can be summarized as: Most of what I read or heard was quite disparaging ( example) about the M4 Sherman Tank (Figure 1). One of these fathers, Alvin Weese, was an Army veteran who was very specific about his WW2 service by saying that he had 'served under Patton' and you could clearly see his pride in having been a soldier in Patton's 3 rd Army.Īs a boy, Alvin's comments about ' Old Blood and Guts' got me curious about the American use of armor during WW2. When I was a boy, most of the fathers in my neighborhood had served in WW2. I know balancing is been more and more done through BR and both M4A3s are 5.Figure 1: Front Armor Angle on Sherman is Angled at 56°. On a side note, as far as I know, T45 was not developed further since 76mm M1 was quite effective with its APCBC against what it faced. 76mm M1 offers an APCBC shell with nice penetration of 106mm at 1,000 meter distance and 63.7gr TNT equivalent explosive filler.Ībout T45 APCR, these APCR shells were given only for balancing purposes and are not required at 3.3-3.7 BR Sherman's in my opinion. Also, I can not imagine you or anyone having a hard time against KV's, Tiger's, Panther's and T-34's with a 76mm M1 armed Sherman. This happens again with the M4A3, while in the US tech tree it's a rank IV in the Japanese tech tree it is a rank III and yet the US rank 3 Shermans with the 76mm gun do not carry any APCR ammo, this means the game makes you go through more trouble to fight KVs, Tigers, Panthers and T-34s than what you had to if they allowed us to carry the APCR rounds those vehicles used IRLĪ reminder, Tier/Rank is irrevelant in the game for like a year or more.

Apcr rounds men of war 2 driver#

This changed with the introduction of the Sherman II at rank II BR 3.7 in the british tech tree, it is a M4A1 with the same 75mm gun but a BR 0.4 higher and yet the same BR as the M4 on the US tech tree also armed with the 75mm M3, the difference is that the british Sherman can use the T45 APCR that can only be used in the US tech tree from BR 4.3 and up (BR 4.3 M4A2 and 5.0 M4A3E2) this means that while you play with the US tanks and occasionaly face a KV-1 and can't pen him and yet the same Shermans on the british tech tree can use APCR and disable the gunner or driver I had always noticed that the early Shermans did not carry HVAP rounds, which I thought was odd since early versions were kept in service until the end of the war (as well as being produced until 1944) and although it is known that back in WW II the usual load was HE > AP > a few HVAP they still carried them and yet they have not been added to them in the gameĪt first I thought it was for balance since even the 75mm APCBC shells were able to kill Pz.IIIs and IVs and even some of the lower BR T-34s, back then I didn't thought much of it although I thought that the rank 3 Shermans would be tough to use against Tigers and KVs without HVAP for the 76mm guns Since the addition of the Japanese ground forces it brought to the game 2 new Shermans, one at rank 3 in the Japanese tech tree and one at rank 2 in the british tech tree